Skip to content
Nic.Hernandez
Go back

The One-Essay-a-Week System

Ira Glass has a quote that haunts everyone who has ever wanted to make something good.

“Nobody tells people who are beginners,” he says, “that all of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there’s a gap.” The gap between what you know is good and what you can actually make. Your taste is solid. Your output is a disappointment. You can see it. That’s the trap.

“A lot of people at that point,” he says, “they quit.”

I didn’t quit. But I didn’t ship, either. I just kept writing — privately, daily, in Markdown files no one would ever read — and told myself I was working on it. The gap didn’t close. It just got more comfortable to live in.

Here’s what changed: I realized I was already writing essays. I just didn’t have a system for finishing them.


For 100 consecutive days, I wrote every morning. That’s not discipline. That’s compulsion. The writing had to happen. Twenty-five thousand words a month, pouring out naturally, following whatever my brain wanted to chew on that day. Julia Cameron calls this practice Morning Pages. She wrote about it in The Artist’s Way as the foundational habit for anyone serious about creative work. I borrowed the idea and never looked back.

The writing was good. Some of it was genuinely essay-worthy — ideas with hooks, arguments with shape, observations that deserved an audience beyond my own screen.

None of it shipped.

Here’s what I know now: the burden of knowing you have something to give, with no plan for giving it, isn’t just a creative problem. It’s a mental health problem. The accumulated weight of unwritten essays and unshipped ideas — all that “rehearsing without performing” — was actively making me sick. Not dramatically. Just the slow erosion of a person who knows they’re capable of more and can’t figure out the bridge from here to there.

Public creativity seemed impossible. Not because I lacked ideas. Because I lacked a system.


Three books gave me the vocabulary to build one.

David Kadavy’s Mind Management, Not Time Management gave me the architecture. His “Creative Systems” concept — repeatable processes that save creative energy. You start with what he calls a Sloppy Operating Procedure. The point isn’t perfection. The point is a structure that evolves through repetition. His “Minimum Creative Dose” gave me permission: the smallest action you can take on a creative project counts. Ten minutes counts. The goal isn’t output — it’s planting the problem so your subconscious can work on it while you sleep.

Cal Newport’s Deep Work gave me the mental-state alignment. Different kinds of work call for different moods and energy levels. Match the work to the state, not the other way around.

Anne-Laure Le Cunff’s Tiny Experiments gave me the framing. The system isn’t a five-year plan. It’s an experiment. Her “curiosity pact” — a commitment to do something for a set period, with emphasis on action over planning — replaced the goal. Her loop model — experiment, observe, adjust, next loop — gave me permission to start messy. She also gave me the line that reframed everything: procrastination isn’t a moral failure. It’s a listening failure.

Shipping is the part that makes me uncomfortable. Which means shipping is the part that matters most.


Here’s the system. I call it the Cascade, based heavily on Kadavy’s repeatable creative systems.

🥼 👨🏾‍🔬 📖 → ✍🏾 → 💡 ⇆ ✍🏾 ⇆ 📋 → 🚢

(Information Input) → (Raw Writing) → (Generate ⇆ Draft ⇆ Edit) → (Ship)

Stage 1 — Fragments of Ideas (🥼 👨🏾‍🔬 📖): Handwritten notes. Books. YouTube videos. Classes. Conversations. The raw material gathered from living and paying attention.

Stage 2 — Raw Writing (✍🏾): The daily journals. Free to roam and wander. Not just journaling — subconscious exploration on the page. The daily clearing where ideas surface without pressure. This is Cameron’s Morning Pages in practice. The throat-clearing that became the raw material for everything else.

Stage 3 — Focused Writing (✍🏾): The +10s. Writing after I’m already warmed up. More structured, tuned for publication. Not forced toward a specific essay — following whatever thread the raw writing lit up.

Stage 4 — The Iterative Pipeline (💡 ⇆ ✍🏾 ⇆ 📋): The weekly process of turning raw material into finished work.

  • 💡 Generate Session: Create an outline. Sit with it. Take notes. Distill ideas from the week’s raw writing. Identify the strongest thread.
  • ✍🏾 Draft Session: Hammer out the outline. Ask the important questions about delivery, structure, voice. Write the draft.
  • 📋 Edit Session: Make changes. Add metadata and schema. Decide where the writing will live.
  • The ⇆ is the point: These stages bounce between one another until it feels right. Not linear. Iterative.

Stage 5 — Ship (🚢): Publish.

All of this happens on different days. The writing, the generating, the drafting, the editing — separate sessions, so the subconscious mind has time to work on the problem over the course of some sleeps. That’s not a preference. That’s how incubation works.

Part of the system is an AI skill I built — a research assistant that reads my entries, identifies voice patterns, flags juicy essay fodder, and tracks recurring themes across weeks. It’s not writing for me. It’s finding the patterns I can’t see from inside my own daily output. The outline for this very essay came out of that process.


Why does this work?

The work becomes the fuel. I wake up thirsty to write now. The system creates its own momentum. Each piece that ships feeds the next cycle of raw writing. It’s not draining. It’s energizing.

The timidity that held me back for years isn’t something I’m proud of. But it’s part of the story. And the only way through a story like this is to tell it straight.

The mental health transformation is real. The burden of unwritten work was making creativity seem impossible. Once the structure existed, the burden became flow. That’s not a side benefit. It’s the argument.

Learning in public is part of the method. I share the process deliberately — both as a service to anyone who might think “hey, maybe I can too,” and as a way to hold myself accountable. You can’t hide behind timidity when you’ve publicly committed to shipping every week. Publishing the method is the method.


Ira Glass said the only way through the gap is a huge volume of work. “Put yourself on a deadline,” he said, “so that every week or every month you know you’re going to finish one story. Because it’s only by actually going through a volume of work that you’re actually going to catch up and close that gap.”

Cameron gave me the daily practice. Kadavy gave me the system. Le Cunff gave me the framing: it’s an experiment, and experiments are meant to be run, not perfected.

Not a finalized process — a first iteration. The system will change as I learn what works and what doesn’t. That’s the point — Le Cunff’s loop. Experiment, observe, adjust, next loop.

The writing was already happening. Twenty-five thousand words a month. One hundred days straight. The system didn’t create the writing. It just connected it to the world.

This is week zero. Let’s see what happens.


Week 0 of a weekly essay series. Nic. Hernandez writes about writing, systems, creativity, and the things that happen when you stop hiding behind timidity.


Share this post on:

Previous Post
Grow It From Seeds
Next Post
What Is Answer Engine Optimization?